Anti Ragging Committee
Anti-Ragging Committee is an entity made to prevent and respond to the ragging occurrences within the College/University. The committee is based on the motto of providing students with a very safe and congenial learning space through strict anti-ragging policies and action in reported cases of ragging.
Motto
“Promotion of Harmony—Ensuring Safety”
Objectives
Roles and Responsibilities
Who can approach the Anti-Ragging Cell
– Any fresher who is a victim of ragging.
– Parents or guardian of the fresher
– Faculty members or staff who have the knowledge of ragging incidents.
Definition of Student Ragging
Ragging means any physical or mental abuse of a student by another student or group of students (including bullying and exclusion). It often contains the following elements:
– Verbal abuse or threats
– Physical violence or assault
– Activities that are forced upon a single individual that cause humiliation or unease
– Harassment—psychological, including isolation or ridicule.
Modus Operandi
The Anti-Ragging Cell functions through both proactive and vigilant measures to nip the evil of ragging in its bud. The institution’s policies and guidelines regarding ragging are brought before all students lucidly at the beginning itself through orientation programs. Regular awareness campaigns and workshops on this issue have also been bringing the message home, Surveillance mechanisms involving regular checks of hostels, common areas, and such other places vulnerable to ragging have been established. There is an anonymous complaint system in place that encourages students to come out and report incidents without the fear of reprisal. The cell functions in tandem with the student bodies, faculty, and local authorities for a consistent approach to ragging and its total coverage in identifying and taking action on any incident.
When a complaint is received, the Anti-Ragging Cell makes a preliminary inquiry first into the incident to ascertain how serious and genuine it is. An inquiry into the matter is then conducted, wherein the victim, the accused, and other eyewitnesses are interrogated. A detailed report is prepared based on these findings, after which suitable disciplinary actions are initiated against those found guilty, based on the policies instated by the university. The cell ensures that the victim gets proper counselling at all stages of the process. This would also provide a safe and congenial environment within the campus by ensuring further well-being to the victim and total stoppage of ragging through regular follow-up.
Inquiry Procedure of Anti-Ragging Cell of UG Programs
What are the possible actions that can be taken against the respondent
1.Warning: The respondent may be formally warned, mentioning the seriousness of the offence that has been committed, and further wrongdoing of this nature will result in appropriate action.
Clause 6 in AICTE Regulations 2009/Clause 6.3 in the UGC Regulations on curbing the Menace of Ragging in Higher Educational Institutions, 2009/ Kerala Prohibition of Ragging Act, 1998 and Chapter 6, Statute 3 Sub Statute 13 of the First Statutes in the Circular No. KTU/ASST6 (ADMIN)/1902/2021 dated 31.07.2022
Sl No. | Composition | Nature of selection | Name of members |
1 | Chairman | Principal of the College/Institution | Dr. Veena V. Principal |
2 | Convener | Senior Faculty/ Head of Department to be nominated by the Principal | Prof .Asha K R |
3 | Secretary | Dr. Linss T Alex, HoD -EEE | |
4 | Members | Heads or Senior Faculty of All Departments (Both male andf emale) including the faculty incharge of Physical Education | Dr. Bindhumol T. V.HoD in charge–CE Dr. Ramadas T, HoD, ME Dr. Neenu Joseph, HoD -ECE Dr. Jeswin Roy Dcouth, HoD -CSE Dr. Jude Martin Mendez, HoD -ASH Prof. Kuriakose V Thundiyil |
5 | TwoMembers | Two female faculty members | Prof. Kanaka Xavier Prof. Anu Antony |
6 | 8Members | Fresher and Senior students (UG)-Both male and female | To be nominated |
7 | 2Members | Fresher and senior students (PG)-Both male and female | To be nominated |
8 | Members | Wardens, Ladies Hostel & Wardens, Men’s Hostel | – |
9 | 1Member | Representative of a Non-Teaching staff in the College | Mr.Leonard C John |
10 | 2Members | PTA nominees | To be nominated |
11 | 1Member | A nominee of the Management | Prof.Paul Ansel V |
12 | 1Member | Representative from Media | Mr. Bijo Silvery, Jeevanadam editor |
13 | 1Member | Representative from an NGO involved in youth activities | Mrs.Maya Mohan Co-founder M/s.Mind Empowered Charitable Trust |
14 | 1Member | Representative from Police Administration | Mr.Vipin Das, Sub Inspector, Kalamassery |
15 | 1Member | Representative from Civil Administration | Mr. A. K. Nishad, Councillor, KalamasseryMuncipality |